Comparison of positive lymph node ratio with an inflammation-based prognostic score in colorectal cancer.

BACKGROUND Two prognostic scoring systems have been proposed in colorectal cancer: the pathologically based positive lymph node ratio (pLNR) and the inflammation-based modified Glasgow Prognostic Score (mGPS). This study compared these two scores with the tumour node metastasis (TNM) staging system in terms of cancer survival. METHODS Between 2003 and 2005, 206 patients, of mean(s.d.) age 69·9(10·6) (range 40-95) years, underwent curative resection for colorectal cancer in two centres. Age, sex, primary tumour site and whether radio/chemotherapy was given were recorded in addition to the three scores (TNM stage, pLNR and mGPS). Univariable and multivariable analyses of overall survival were performed. RESULTS Age, rectal cancer, TNM stage, pLNR and mGPS were significant factors in univariable analysis. On multivariable analysis, N category and tumour stage (I-III) were removed from the model, leaving pLNR and mGPS as independent predictors of overall survival: hazard ratio 1·51 (95 per cent confidence interval 1·24 to 1·84; P < 0·001) and 1·56 (1·18 to 2·08; P = 0·020) respectively. C-statistic analysis, used to compare pLNR and mGPS directly, found only pLNR to be significant (P < 0·001) CONCLUSION This study found pLNR to be the superior prognostic scoring system in determining long-term survival in patients undergoing resection for colorectal cancer.